| HOME | ABOUT DAVE EMORY | SUPPORT DAVE EMORY

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

FTR #497 Nightmare

Recorded January 30, 2005
REALAUDIO

This broadcast presents a number of existing or potential American political realities that should come to pass in a nightmare only. Unfortunately, this nightmare threatens to become a waking one. The show begins with a hypothetical scenario in which an American and/or Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities would precipitate a disastrous response by Iran’s Russian-built ship-killing cruise missiles, the Sunburn and the Yakhonts. Defenseless against these advanced missiles, the US Navy’s forces in the Persian Gulf could experience a disaster if Iran were to deploy the weapons against the Sixth Fleet. If this were to happen, it could lead to a much wider and potentially disastrous conflict in the Middle East. Another part of the nightmare is already coming into reality: the Christian Right’s enormous influence within the Bush administration and the effect that these “End Times” aficionados could have on US environmental policy and American educational policy. It would be difficult to imagine a foreign enemy having any more devastating effect on American society. The program undertakes an examination of a hypothetical concept: the possibility that the Underground Reich may have seized on the Christian Fundamentalist constituency in the US as a vehicle for the subjugation and/or destruction of this country and world Jewry. The program concludes with an article that discloses just how far the United States had slipped in recent decades—we aren’t “Number One” any more. One alternative scenario is discussed in the program. Tehran has a major earthquake fault running through it that is overdue for a devastating quake. The possibility that seismic weaponry (Tesla-based HAARP technology) might be used to trigger a quake and destabilize Iran is not one to be too readily dismissed.

Program Highlights Include: Detailed discussion of the capabilities of the Russian-made ship-killing missiles; analysis of the apocalyptic scenario that could result from a US and/or Israeli attack on Iran; a chronicling of the already devastating effects that Bush administration environmental policy has had on the US; a 1944 projection that the Third Reich would ally with American Protestant fundamentalists in order to subdue the US; Nazi and CIA spymaster Reinhard Gehlen’s embrace of evangelical Christianity after his retirement from the BND (German intelligence).

1. The first part of the broadcast consists of reading and analysis of a terrifying article by Mark Gaffney. Detailing a scenario in which U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf could be devastated by Iran’s Russian-built anti-ship cruise missiles, this article might become reality if hostilities break out between the US and Israel on the one hand, and Iran on the other. Analysis and excerpting of the article can be found below. The text of the article itself follows:

Iran: A Bridge too Far?
by Mark Gaffney

10/26/04 "ICH" -- Last July, they dubbed it Operation Summer Pulse: a simultaneous mustering of US Naval forces, world wide, that was unprecedented. According to the Navy, it was the first exercise of its new Fleet Response Plan (FRP), the purpose of which was to enable the Navy to respond quickly to an international crisis. The Navy wanted to show its increased force >>Continue original article>>

2. There are a number of points to be made about this article. One of them concerns the extent of superiority of the Sunburn and Yakhonts missiles over anything the U.S. has faced. “ . . . The Sunburn can deliver a 200-kiloton nuclear payload, or: a 750-pound conventional warhead, within a range of 100 miles, more than twice the range of the Exocet. The Sunburn combines a Mach 2.1 speed (two times the speed of sound) with a flight pattern that hugs the deck and includes ‘violent end maneuvers’ to elude enemy defenses. The missile was specifically designed to defeat the US Aegis radar defense system. Should a US Navy Phalanx point defense somehow manage to detect an incoming Sunburn missile, the system has only seconds to calculate a fire solution—not enough time to take out the intruding missile. The US Phalanx defense employs a six-barreled gun that fires 3,000 depleted-uranium rounds a minute, but the gun must have precise coordinates to destroy an intruder ‘just in time.’” (“A Bridge Too Far?” by Mark Gaffney; p. 3.)

3. “The Sunburn’s combined supersonic speed and payload size produce tremendous kinetic energy on impact, with devastating consequences for ship and crew. A single one of these missiles can sink a large warship, yet costs considerably less than a fighter jet. Although the Navy has been phasing out the older Phalanx defense system, its replacement, known as the Rolling Action Missile (RAM) has never been tested against the weapon it seems destined to one day face in combat. . . .” (Idem.)

4. The Yakhonts missile is even more sophisticated. “ . . . The US ships in the Gulf will already have come within range of the Sunburn missiles and the even more-advanced SS-NX-26 Yakhonts missiles, also Russian-made (speed: Mach 2.9; range: 180 miles) deployed by the Iranians along the Gulf’s northern shore. Every US ship will be exposed and vulnerable. When the Iranians spring the trap, the entire lake will become a killing field. . . .Try and imagine it if you can: barrage after barrage of Exocet-class missiles, which the Iranians are known to possess in the hundreds, as well as the unstoppable Sunburn and Yakhonts missiles. The questions that our purblind government leaders should be asking themselves, today, if they value what historians will one day write about them, are two: how many of the Russian anti-ship missiles has Putin already supplied to Iran? And: How many more are currently in the pipeline? In 2001, Jane’s Defense Weekly reported that Iran was attempting to acquire anti-ship missiles from Russia. Ominously, the same report also mentioned that the more advanced Yakhonts missile was ‘optimized for attacks against carrier task forces.’ Apparently its guidance system is ‘able to distinguish an aircraft carrier from its escorts.’ The numbers were not disclosed. . . .” (Ibid.; p. 6.)

5. Aside from the inherently disturbing possibilities discussed in this article, a number of questions suggest themselves. One of those questions is this: to what extent are members of the Bush administration deliberately seeking the apocalyptic scenario presented here? The administration is heavily influenced by what Mr. Emory calls “the Armageddon Lobby.” Is it possible that people within the administration deliberately seek catastrophe in order to fulfill biblical prophecy? One of the central questions asked in this broadcast concerns a hypothetical scenario presented in the book The Nazis Go Underground, excerpted below. Author Curt Riess ruminates about the possibility that the Third Reich—in its plans for postwar underground supremacy—might seek common ground with American evangelicals in an attempt to dominate the United States. With Otto von Bolschwing’s protégé Helene van Damm having selected the personnel lists from which Reagan made his presidential appointments, how many Underground Reich figures have wormed their way into the GOP and the US government? (For more about von Bolschwing and van Damm, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 421, 465.)

6. One also wonders to what extent the Muslim nations of the Middle East are being utilized as proxy warriors to weaken or destroy what’s left of the United States? In FTR#359, we viewed the projection of Adolf Hitler as embodied in doctrine possessed by Francois Genoud, an Underground Reich operative who figures in the Al Taqwa milieu. (For more about Genoud, see—among other programs—FTR#453.) The people of the Third World were seen as warriors to carry on Hitler’s conflict against the allies. In a number of the programs recorded in the run-up to the Iraq war, Mr. Emory voiced his view that the US was falling into a trap set by the Underground Reich and its allies—a trap that would pit the US against the Muslim populations of what the Nazi geopoliticians called the Earth Island. It remains to be seen if Iran becomes one of these proxy warrior populations. In that context, one should remember that the Al Taqwa milieu is very close to the fundamentalist clerics who govern Iran. It is also important to remember that—in war—one makes use of the stupidity, shortsightedness and greed of one’s opponents. There is no shortage of these qualities in the Bush administration, which Mr. Emory believes is a Fifth Column for the Underground Reich.

7. At the conclusion of the discussion of Gaffney’s article, Mr. Emory notes that a major earthquake fault runs through Tehran, and it is overdue for a quake. One of the apparent capabilities of Project HAARP is its ability to precipitate earthquakes. The US and the former Soviet Union had a treaty on the use of environmental modification for the purposes of warfare, which specifically alluded to earthquakes. The treaty was on the books by the mid 1970’s. Do not be too surprised to see the Iranian impasse resolved by a devastating earthquake. That quake might produce social unrest and regime change, or might simply destroy the Iranian economy and neutralize the country’s nuclear ambitions. This broadcast was recorded on 1/30 of 2005. In late February, Iran experienced a serious, though not crippling earthquake. (The country is a major area of seismic activity.) It remains to be seen if a more serious quake on the fault running through Tehran has a bearing on the situation in Iran. (For more about the use of earthquakes as weapons, see FTR#69. For more about project HAARP, see FTR#’s 1, 30, 79, 101.)

8. The next major portion of the program highlights an address given by Bill Moyers at Harvard Medical School. The address focuses on the grim prospects the Bush administration’s environmental policies hold for the future. In particular, the rise of fundamentalist Christianity has led some to disregard any harm done to the ecosystem as irrelevant with the return of Jesus imminent. Analysis and excerpting of the article are to be found below. The text of the speech follows:

On Receiving Harvard Medical School's Global Environment Citizen Award
by Bill Moyers
Published on Monday, December 6, 2004 by CommonDreams.org


On Wednesday, December 1, 2004, the Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Medical School presented its fourth annual Global Environment Citizen Award to Bill Moyers. In presenting the award, Meryl Streep, a member of the Center board, said, "Through resourceful, intrepid reportage and perceptive voices from the forward edge of the debate, Moyers has examined an environment under siege with the aim of engaging citizens." Here is the text of his response to Ms. Streep's presentation of the award:

I accept this award on behalf of >>Continue original article>>

9. The Moyers address highlights once again the potential for the GOP’s Christian Armageddon Lobby to precipitate disaster. Just as an apocalyptic war with Islam as part of the End Times Prophecy would fit the Armageddon Lobby’s agenda, so, too would the physical destruction of the environment. Although some evangelical Christians embrace pro-environmentalism, the casual disregard of others of their faith for the sanctity of the ecosphere is frightening. In the discussion points that follow, we will examine a hypothetical point: the possibility that the Underground Reich may be utilizing the Born-Agains as a vehicle for the realization of many of their goals—especially the destruction and/or subjugation of the United States and the annihilation of the Jews.

10. Next, Mr. Emory presents a hypothetical element of discussion: the possibility that the Third Reich may have allied with Protestant fundamentalists in the U.S. at the end of World War II. That was a projection made in an anti-fascist book published in early 1944: “Also of interest to Berlin—particularly in view of the coming underground fight of the Nazis—must be the Fundamentalist Protestants, who have a considerable following in Michigan, Kansas, Colorado, and Minnesota. To be sure, some of the Fundamentalists are among the most courageous fighters for democracy, but a great many of them are definitely pro-Hitler. Their reason for this stand is that Fundamentalists do not believe in freedom of religion, and they do believe that the Jews should be punished because they killed Christ. They say that Hitler has been sent by God to ‘save Christianity and destroy atheistic Communism.’ To many of them Japan is the ‘oriental outpost of Christianity’ destined to save Asia from the danger of a ‘Communistic China.’”
(The Nazis Go Underground; by Curt Riess; Copyright 1944 by Curt Riess; Doubleday, Doran and Co., Inc. [HC]; pp. 125-126. Library of Congress Control Number: 44007162.)

11. Suppose, for the sake of argument, that the planners of the Third Reich’s postwar underground strategy wanted to eliminate the United States as a competitive world power and wished to finish their extermination of the Jews. They would not have been able to plot a military solution to the problem with the U.S. in possession of the atomic bomb. They would have had to seek another solution. By encouraging a reactionary form of fundamentalist Christianity in the United States, they could gut the U.S. educational system—thereby denying the United States of the scientific and technical minds necessary to maintain scientific, technological and intellectual parity in the modern world. The despoliation of the environment highlighted in the Moyers address would, in time, decimate the American population, its landscape and natural resources. After much of the world’s Jewish population had emigrated to Israel, that country could be destroyed by hostile Muslim neighbors. (In this regard, one should not overlook the Al Taqwa milieu and its links with the Underground Reich. In his exhaustive series on 9/11 and related events, Mr. Emory advanced his theory that the Muslim populations of the Earth Island were being cultivated by the Underground Reich as proxy warriors against the U.S., Britain and the Jews—their erstwhile World War II enemies. For more about the use of the Muslim populations of the earth as proxy warriors for the Underground Reich, see the shows listed in FTR#391.) The Armageddon/End Times scenario so popular among the Christian Right (if realized) would “fit the bill” nicely.

12. Following his formal retirement from the intelligence field, General Reinhard Gehlen became a religious evangelist. Was this remarkable conversion in any way connected to the contingency plans discussed above in the excerpt from the Curt Riess text? (For more about Gehlen, see—among other programs—RFA#’s 1, 2, 3, 14, 15, 22, 36, 37—available from Spitfire.) In the context of Mr. Emory’s speculation about the possibility that the Underground Reich may be utilizing the Christian Right as a vehicle for effecting the destruction and/or subjugation of the Underground Reich, it should be recalled that the Gehlen reported to Bormann’s security chief, Heinrich Muller and that Gehlen was clearing his postwar actions taken in conjunction with US intelligence with Admiral von Doenitz (Hitler’s nominal successor as head of state) and General Franz Halder, his former chief-of-staff. In his operations, Gehlen was operating as part of the Underground Reich. (For more about Gehlen’s activities on behalf of the Underground Reich, see FTR#’s 180, 305.) “Today, on the threshold of three score years and ten, General Reinhard Gehlen has found a surprising new field of activities. He has become an evangelist. With still unimpaired energy he has taken over the direction of a campaign for building new churches and schools for the Evangelical Church in Catholic Bavaria. After a life of seclusion he frequently attends meetings all over the province at which appeals for new funds are launched; on occasion he does not disdain to visit members of his religious community in order to encourage the enterprise and to pass the begging bowl. . .”
(Gehlen: Spy of the Century; by E.H. Cookridge; 1973 [SC] Pyramid Books; Copyright 1971 by European Copyright Company Limited; ISBN 0-515-03154-2; p. 450.)

13. The program concludes with the reading of an article that sets the “We’re Number One” boast in context. We (the United States) aren’t number one anymore. Although it would be a mistake to ascribe all of the decline that the U.S. has experienced to the rise of the Christian Right and the Armageddon Lobby, their role in the dumbing down of America and the creeping return of this country to a pre-Enlightenment culture should not be too readily discounted. Has the “Gehlen Ministry” been deliberately pursuing this end? The Austin Chronicle article follows, and it speaks for itself:

#1?
By Michael Ventura

No concept lies more firmly embedded in our national character than the notion that the USA is "No. 1," "the greatest." Our broadcast media are, in essence, continuous advertisements >>Continue original article>>

Tuesday, February 01, 2005

FTR #496 Triumph of the Shill, Part V - Update on the Gropenfuhrer

Recorded Januaery 23, 2005
REALAUDIO

Catching up on the gubernatorial administration of Arnold Schwarzenegger, this program details the Machiavellian hypocrisy of Schwarzenegger’s term. (For more about Schwarzenegger, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 421, 422, 429, 434, 436, 440, 492.) In particular, the broadcast reviews Mr. Emory’s prognostications from late August of 2003 (when Schwarzenegger was running for Governor.) In that program, Mr. Emory noted that—throughout his bodybuilding career—Schwarzenegger would practice a Machiavellian form of psychological warfare, in which he would pretend to be going in one direction and then reverse his field. As governor, Schwarzenegger has behaved in exactly the same fashion. He has “flip-flopped” in a consummately cynical manner, doing things he promised he wouldn’t do and not doing things that he had promised to do. Particularly noteworthy is Schwarzenegger’s unparalleled coddling of the very special interests he promised to shun. Schwarzenegger is also positioning himself as something of an American Fuhrer, centralizing power in the governor’s office and moving to become a dictator of sorts. Exemplifying Schwarzenegger’s hypocrisy is his veto of a bill that would have severely restricted the sale of body-building dietary supplements; despite his public pronouncements against the use of those items. Schwarzenegger profits from the sale of these very supplements.

Program Highlights Include: Review of Enron CEO Ken Lay’s solicitation of a Schwarzenegger candidacy during California’s manufactured energy crisis; Schwarzenegger’s cynical manipulation of body-building rivals Lou Ferrigno and Frank Zane; the cruel practical jokes that “the Gropenfuhrer” plays on his wife; Schwarzenegger’s betrayal of a campaign promise to resist the Bush administration’s logging policies in California; Schwarzenegger’s reversal of promises made to educators; Der Terminator’s betrayal of a campaign promise not to finance state government by borrowing; Schwarzenegger’s record fund-raising from the very “special interests” that he pretends to oppose; the Gropenfuhrer’s cozy relationship with ChevronTexaco Corporation; Schwarzenegger’s dismissal of a number of consumer advocates.

1. The first part of the program reviews information from FTR#422. When running for governor, Schwarzenegger promised that he would resist control by the “special interests” and that he would provide open, fiscally responsible government. As noted in FTR#422, the very genesis of Schwarzenegger’s political candidacy was at the behest of the “special interests.” In FTR#422, Mr. Emory noted that Schwarzenegger is a deliberate, Machiavellian liar and manipulator. He is adept at leading people in one direction and then sticking it to them by doing the opposite of what he led them to believe he would do. His meeting with Ken Lay and Michael Milken is typical of Schwarzenegger’s personality and ethic. Among the most revealing and cynical of Schwarzenegger’s networking moves is his powwow with Kenneth Lay, the CEO of Enron during the very time period that Enron was helping to destabilize California with the deliberately-constructed “Energy Crisis.” (For more about the destabilization of California and the phony energy crisis, see FTR#’s 280, 420.) This puts Schwarzenegger “right smack dab in the middle” of these shenanigans. In FTR#429, we noted that as soon as Schwarzenegger was elected, he agreed to settle the lawsuits by Cruz Bustamente for pennies on the dollar, thereby fulfilling his mandate from the special interests. “Arnold Schwarzenegger isn’t talking. The Hollywood action film star and California’s GOP gubernatorial candidate in the state’s recall election has been unusually silent about his plans for running the Golden State. He hasn’t yet offered up a solution for the state’s $38 billion budget deficit, an issue that largely got more than one million people to sign a petition to recall Gov. Gray Davis. More important, however, Schwarzenegger still won’t respond to questions about why he was at the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills two years ago where he, former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan and junk bond king Michael Milken, met secretly with former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay, who was touting a plan for solving the state’s energy crisis.”
(“Ahnuld, Ken Lay, George Bush, Dick Cheney and Gray Davis” by Jason Leopold; CommonDreams.org; 8/17/2003; p. 1.)

2. “While Schwarzenegger, Riordan and Milken listened to Lay’s pitch, Gov. Davis pleaded with president George Bush to enact much needed price controls on electricity sold in the state, which skyrocketed to more than $200 per megawatt-hour. Davis said that Texas-based energy companies were manipulating California’s power market, charging obscene prices for power and holding consumers hostage. Bush agreed to meet with Davis at the Century Plaza Hotel in West Los Angeles on May 29, 2001, five days after Lay met with Schwarzenegger, to discuss the California power crisis.” (Idem.)

3. “At the meeting, Davis asked Bush for federal assistance, such as imposing federally mandated price caps, to rein in soaring energy prices. But Bush refused saying California legislators designed an electricity market that left too many regulatory restrictions in place and that’s what caused electricity prices in the state to skyrocket. It was up to the governor to fix the problem, Bush said. However, Bush’s response appears to be part of a coordinated effort launched by Lay to have Davis shoulder the blame for the crisis. It worked. According to recent polls, a majority of voters grew increasingly frustrated with the way Davis handled the power crisis. Schwarzenegger has used the energy crisis and missteps by Davis to bolster his standing with potential voters. While Davis took a beating in the press (some energy companies ran attack ads against the governor), Lay used his political clout to gather support for deregulation.” (Idem.)

4. “A couple of weeks before Lay met with Schwarzenegger in may 2001, the PBS news program ‘Frontline’ interviewed Vice President Dick Cheney, whom Lay met with privately a month earlier. Cheney was asked by a correspondent from Frontline whether energy companies were acting like a cartel and using manipulative tactics to cause electricity prices to spike in California.” (Idem.)

5. “ ‘No,’ Cheney said during the Frontline interview. ‘The problem you had in California was caused by a combination of things—an unwise regulatory scheme, because they didn’t really deregulate. Now they’re trapped from unwise regulatory schemes, plus not having addressed the supply side of the issue. They’ve obviously created major problems for themselves and bankrupted PG & E in the process.’” (Idem.)

6. “The 90-minute secret meeting Lay convened took place inside a conference room at the Peninsula Hotel. Lay, and other Enron representatives at the meeting, handed out a four-page document to Schwarzenegger, Riordan and Milken titled ‘Comprehensive Solution for California,’ which called for an end to federal and state investigations into Enron’s role in the California energy crisis and said consumers should pay for the state’s disastrous experiment with deregulation through multibillion rate increases. Another bullet point in the four-page document said ‘Get deregulation right this time—California needs a real electricity market, not government takeovers.” (Ibid; p. 2.)

7. “The irony of that statement is that California’s flawed power market design helped Enron earn more than $500 million in one year, a tenfold increase in profits from a previous year and it’s coordinated effort in manipulating the price of electricity in California, which other power companies mimicked, cost the state close to $70 billion and led to the beginning of what is now the state’s $38 billion budget deficit. The power crisis forced dozens of businesses to close down or move to other states, where cheaper electricity was in abundant supply, and greatly reduced the revenue California relied heavily upon.” (Idem.)

8. “Lay asked the participants to support his plan and lobby the state legislature to make it a law. It’s unclear whether Schwarzenegger held a stake in Enron at the time or if he followed through on Lay’s request. His Spokesman Rob Stutzman hasn’t returned numerous calls for comment about the meeting. For Schwarzenegger and the others who attended the meeting, associating with Enron, particularly Ken Lay, the disgraced chairman of the high-flying energy company, during the peak of California’s power crisis in May 2001 could be compared to meeting with Osama bin Laden after 9-11 to understand why terrorism isn’t necessarily such a heinous act. A person who attended the meeting at the Peninsula, which this reporter wrote about two years ago said Lay invited Schwarzenegger and Riordan because the two were being courted in 2001 as GOP gubernatorial candidates.” (Idem.)

9. If one were to describe Schwarzenegger’s personality in one word, it would be Machiavellian. He has given abundant evidence of this, even during his bodybuilding days. His signature cinematic effort, “Pumping Iron,” showcased his cynicism. “The genuinely creepy moments [in “Pumping Iron”] come two-thirds in. In one scene, he brags about missing his father’s funeral in order to train for a competition. Talking about his chief rival, Lou Ferrigno (who went on to become TV’s ‘Incredible Hulk’), Schwarzenegger tells the documentary camera, ‘It doesn’t matter if he’s in shape or out of shape.’ He plans on messing with his mind. ‘I will mix him up. He will come so ready, but the next morning, he will be ready to lose.’ Of this form of psychological manipulation, he says, ‘All these things are available, and so if they’re available, you might as well use them.’ He smiles, and at this point he looks downright sinister.”
(“Film Probes Beyond Muscles” by Mick LaSalle; San Francisco Chronicle; 8/15/2003; p. D17.)

10. “The movie shows him putting his strategy to work on the morning of the competition. He has breakfast with Ferrigno and Ferrigno’s parents and subtly undermines his friend’s confidence. Behind a mask of affability, he says that Ferrigno, who is huge, would have had a better chance of winning with another month’s training (‘A month from now would be perfect for you’). He asks Ferrigno, ‘You look kind of worried today.’ He consoles Ferrigno in advance for losing. Finally, he gets up from the table and tells Ferrigno’s father, ‘Help him pump up. Calm him down.’ By the end of breakfast, poor Ferrigno looks tied up in a psychological knot. At the competition, we see him posing as though apologetic about his body, when he could have just as easily won.” (Idem.)

11. “Even after the competition, Schwarzenegger—clearly having fun—continues his barrage, riding on a bus with Ferrigno and his folks, talking about how he plans to come to New York, eat spaghetti and date Ferrigno’s sister. Everything’s said with a smile, but the whole time he seems to be laughing at this guileless, sweet family. Frankly, it’s almost sickening. ‘I was always dreaming about very powerful people—dictators and things like that,’ Schwarzenegger says of his childhood early in the film. ‘Pumping Iron’ makes it plain that this is one fellow who had the will to power at an early age.” (Idem.)

12. Equally revealing of Schwarzenegger’s character is his Machiavellian, cynical behavior toward Frank Zane, one of his successors as Mr. Olympia. “In August 1980, Arnold, now known in the bodybuilding community chiefly as CBS commentator and, along with Jim Lorimer, producer of bodybuilding shows, attended the Miss Olympia contest at the Philadelphia Sheraton. Rick Wayne, there to cover the show for a [Joe] Wieder magazine, interviewed Arnold afterward. Casually, Rick asked Arnold, who had now been retired from bodybuilding for five years, if he would ever consider making a comeback. ‘No,’ Arnold said firmly. ‘No amount of money could tempt me out of retirement.’ The only reason he had been training, he told Rick, was that he was rehearsing for his part as bodybuilder Mickey Hargitay in the upcoming The Jayne Mansfield Story. As an aside he mentioned that he was planning to be in Australia for the 1980 Mr. Olympia contest, having just been signed by CBS as commentator for the event. Rick, ending the interview, believed every word that Arnold had said.”
(Arnold: The Unauthorized Biography; by Wendy Leigh; Copyright 1990 by Wendy Leigh; Congdon & Weed [HC]; ISBN 0-86553-216-8; pp. 178-179.)

13. “Meanwhile, back on the West Coast, the reigning Mr. Olympia, Frank Zane, had suffered a severe setback. Eight weeks before the contest in which he expected to win his fourth Mr. Olympia title, Frank met with a terrible accident that almost killed him. After a spell in the hospital, on the verge of withdrawing from the contest, Frank approached Arnold and asked his advice. The accident, he said, had weakened him, interrupted his training, and left its mark. Should he still compete in the 1980 Mr. Olympia or back out of the whole thing? Arnold, whom Frank habitually viewed as a friend and coach, thought for a moment, then said that he strongly believed that Frank should go to Australia and defend his Mr. Olympia title. As an afterthought, Frank, a man who is nobody’s fool and had been Arnold’s friend for more than twelve years, casually asked him if he planned to compete. No, said Arnold. He was going to Australia to do commentary on the Olympia for CBS—that was all.” (Ibid.; p. 179.)

14. “Two weeks before the 1980 Mr. Olympia, Arnold fell ill, losing ten pounds. That didn’t deter him from giving an interview to Austrian journalist Roman Schliesser, who wrote about Arnold on a regular basis in his column ‘Adabei’ for the Viennese paper Die Kronen Zeitung. And if [Schwarzenegger rival Mike] Mentzer, Zane, et al, had subscribed to Die Kronen Zeitung and had been fortunate enough to understand German, they would not have been at all surprised by the events that took place subsequently in Sydney, Australia. For Arnold had quite openly revealed to Schliesser, ‘On October 4th the next Mr. Olympia will be chosen in Sydney. I’m a sports commentator for CBS television. But I’m doing it. I’ve trained for six weeks. . . . I’m against Frank Zane who was Mr. Olympia three times, but they will all cry when I win again.’ Schliesser’s article was published on September 28th, just six days before Arnold dropped his bombshell on the 1980 Mr. Olympia contest.” (Ibid.; pp. 180-181.)

15. “The night before the contest Boyer Coe discovered that Arnold was planning to make a comeback. After watching Arnold strip down, he took Frank Zane aside and, with a degree of concern for Arnold, wondered out loud, ‘Why is Arnold doing this to himself? He doesn’t have a prayer.’ Not only had he been out of competition for the past five years; bodybuilding had also changed. In Arnold’s day only three or four other bodybuilders had come close to approaching his standard. Now there were many. Moreover, the level of competition was far higher and the bodybuilder’s routines were less haphazard and more choreographed. Later that night Arnold approached Zane and asked if he wanted to share a dressing room with him. Frank replied, “Arnold, are you trying to psych me out?’ ‘Oh, no,’ replied Arnold. ‘I wouldn’t try and do that.’” (Ibid.; pp. 182-183.)

16. “Frank Zane was Arnold’s next target. A year later Arnold described his tactics in an interview: ‘I knew Frank Zane would be tense at the moment of the competition, because he hadn’t laughed once in the last six weeks. So if I could crack him up with a good joke, all the laughter that he had stored would come out in a torrent. So I prepared a joke and told it to him during the prejudging. He cracked up so much that he leaned back and bent over. And of course the judges are always looking and making notes. They probably thought, ‘He is not taking this seriously.’ After five years away from competition it was wonderful to use psychological warfare again.’” (Ibid.; p. 183.)

17. “In interviews filmed for The Comeback, conducted before and during the contest, Arnold would allege that he was insecure about stepping on stage for the first time in five years. But as he began to pose to the strains of ‘Exodus,’ he enthused that nothing had changed. Waiting for the results, he was exultant: overflowing with enthusiasm and self-confidence, impatient to hear the outcome of the 1980 Mr. Olympia, convinced that he had won. As Dan Howard, one of the 1980 judges, says, ‘Arnold beats people before they go onstage.’ He was right. Although Arnold had trained for only eight weeks, while all the other contestants had trained for a year, he was nevertheless declared the 1980 Mr. Olympia. The audience went wild. Though not in the way to which Arnold was accustomed.” (Ibid.; pp. 183-184.)

18. “Paul Graham, executive producer of The Comeback, with the help of film editor Geoff Bennett, didn’t include in the film’s sound track the subsequent eruption that greeted the announcement of the 1980 Olympia winner. In the words of an eyewitness, ‘The audience was furious, throwing things, swearing. A great chorus of ‘Rigged, rigged, rigged’ flared up. There’s never been anything like it in any bodybuilding contest ever. Everyone in the place was booing Arnold, shouting ‘bullshit,’ and brawling in disgust. Arnold was enraged and went red in the face.’” (Ibid.; p. 184.)

19. After the hostile reaction of the crowd, Schwarzenegger evidenced the brutal, degrading behavior toward Maria Shriver that we will examine at greater length at the end of the program. “Seething with anger, Arnold stormed out of the Sydney Opera House with a group of reporters in hot pursuit. Almost running toward the exit, he avoided answering their questions, tossing his head in a combination of anger and disdain. Close to the exit, he suddenly realized that Maria, far from being by his side, was talking to some reporters behind him. According to Helmut Cerncic, at the top of his voice Arnold screamed, ‘You stupid bitch, I’m waiting for you. Come here.’ Witnessing the scene, Helmut, who had known Arnold since he was a teenage misfit all those years ago in the Athletic Union, thought to himself, ‘This boy from Austria, who never had a penny, couldn’t speak English, now knows someone from the Kennedy family and speaks to her like that. It was amazing.’” (Idem.)

20. Schwarzenegger’s victory may not have been the result of objective viewpoints on the part of the judges. “Among the more serious allegations was the one claiming that all the judges of the 1980 Mr. Olympia either were Arnold’s friends or had business relationships with him. And although no one accused the IFBB of having fixed the contest in Arnold’s favor, it seemed as if the judges had had eyes only for him.” (Ibid.; p. 185.)

21. The balance of the broadcast sets forth Schwarzenegger’s predictably cynical, hypocritical conduct as governor. Just as Mr. Emory had forecast in FTR#422, Schwarzenegger has treated the people of California in the same manner he had treated Lou Ferrigno and Frank Zane. After promising not to favor the special interests and vowing to run a transparent administration, Schwarzenegger is awash in special interest money and is running a secretive, opaque government. “ . . . Where Schwarzenegger has not even begun to change ‘the political climate of our state,’ as he promised a year ago, is in special-interest money in Sacramento. He’s swimming in the ocean of it, just like his predecessors and the Legislature. Nor has he run government with the windows and doors open, as he vowed to do. Only this week, did he promise to release his calendar so the public could see who has been meeting with him. . .”
(“A Solid Term so far, but Still Incomplete”; San Jose Mercury News; 11/17/2004; p. 6B.)

22. Predictably, Schwarzenegger is breaking promises made on a number of important issues: “Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s success during his first year relied on cutting deals and sharing the stage with unlikely allies. But after his State of the State speech sounded like an expiration notice on many of those agreements, onetime allies are left wondering, how good is the governor’s word? Negotiators who reached compromises with Schwarzenegger over public schools, retirement benefits for state workers and a balanced budget amendment say they are now wary of working with the governor as they head into budget talks this week.”
(“Governor Dumps Deals, Creates Mistrust” by Ann E. Marimow; San Jose Mercury News; 1/9/2005; p. 1A.)

23. “ ‘It’s not credible when you walk away from an agreement that’s barely a year old,’ said Kevin Gordon, executive director of the California Association of School Business Officials. . .” (Ibid.; pp. 1A-17A.)

24. Having vowed not to finance the machinery of California government with borrowing, Schwarzenegger has done—surprise, surprise—just what he said he would not do. “Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s budget plan for eliminating an $8 billion state deficit relies on substantial borrowing and fundshifting that is already angering local school and transportation officials. The proposal, to be released Monday, calls for at least $2.5 billion in borrowing, diverting transportation funds to pay for other programs, and loading school districts with $1.1 billion in borrowing, diverting transportation funds to pay for other programs, and loading school districts with $1.1 billion in new pension costs, administration officials said. . . .”
(“Budget Proposal Boosts Debt” by Andrew LaMar; San Jose Mercury News; 1/7/2005; p. 1A.)

25. Schwarzenegger is resorting to the selective use of non-profit organizations to further his utilization of special interest money. This is, of course, exactly the type of thing he said he wouldn’t do. “Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has quietly incorporated a private nonprofit group that can help advance his political goals without disclosing the source of its money. . . The new entity, which received tax exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service this week comes forward as the Republican governor sets a near-record pace in fund-raising. After spending nearly $27 million to win the October recall election, Schwazenegger has added $11 million since, and appears poised to raise millions more before the November election.”
(“Gov. Schwarzenegger Forms Group To Raise Funds”; KFMB-TV San Diego 3/27/04.)

26. “Despite promises to open up government and even his own calendar for public review, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s efforts to reshape California benefit from millions of dollars in spending by nonprofit groups that are not required to disclose where they get or how they spend their money. These groups have supported some of Schwarzenegger’s most memorable events, including trade missions to Tokyo and Tel Aviv, bus tours up and down the state and even the July appearance at a shopping mall in Ontario where he called Democrats ‘girlie men’ during the budget impasse. . . .”
(“Nonprofits Tangle Schwarzenegger’s Fund-Raising Machine” by Tom Chorneau [AP]; San Francisco Chronicle; 11/19/2004; p. 1.)

27. As might have been predicted, Schwarzenegger is running an administration that is favoring special interests. He is not protecting the “little people” he said he’d champion. He has ousted a number or pro-consumer activists from state government. “For the third time since taking office last fall, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has ousted a high-ranking state consumer regulator stirring complaints among advocates that he is stripping a respected consumer protection department of its strongest voices.”
(“Consumer Activists Troubled by Gov.’s Firings” by Peter Nicholas; Los Angeles Times; 5/27/2004; p. 1.)

28. In characteristically Machiavellian style, Schwarzenegger has reversed a promise to resist the Bush administration’s attempts to roll back prohibitions against logging on national forest lands. “A year ago, when he was running for governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger promised to fight attempts by the Bush administration to roll back a landmark Clinton-era policy that reduced logging on 11 million acres of national forests across California’s Sierra Nevada range. Yet the Bush administration killed Clinton’s Sierra plan last week—without a peep of protest from Schwarzenegger.”
(“Logging Pledge Quietly Ignored: Schwarzenegger Vowed to Oppose Bush Increase” by Paul Rogers; San Jose Mercury News; 11/24/2004; p. 1.)

29. “The governor and his staff also did not appeal the original Bush decision in January, when 6,200 other members of the public filed appeals with the U.S. Forest Service. The campaign promise—part of ‘Arnold’s Agenda to Bring California Back’—has now been removed from his web site (www.joinarnold.com). Environmentalists are incensed, charging that Schwarzenegger backed away from one of his central environmental campaign promises, and one of the few in which the then-Republican candidate directly disagreed with the Bush administration on an environmental issue. . .” (Idem.)

30. Schwarzenegger has scratched the back of the ChevronTexaco Corporation—another of his favored special interests. “Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s ambitious to reorganize almost every aspect of state government was influenced significantly by oil and gas giant ChevronTexaco Corp., which managed to shape such key recommendations as the removal of restrictions on oil refineries. . . .”
(“Chevron Gave Big to Schwarzenegger” by Tom Chorneau [AP]; yahoo.com; 9/2/2004; p. 2.)

31. Nothing embodies Schwarzenegger’s hypocrisy more dramatically than his duplicitous attitude toward dangerous body-building dietary supplements. Even among the steroid-laden world of body-building, Schwarzenegger was notorious for the extraordinary amounts of steroids he consumed. Despite publicly speaking out against steroid use by young athletes, Schwarzenegger vetoed legislation that might have reduced his income from the marketing of such supplements. “In late September—in what appears to be a conflict of interest—Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that could have affected his personal finances. The legislation proposed that, as a condition of playing sports, public high school athletes agree not to use performance-enhancing dietary supplements (PEDS) that are listed as dangerous by the Department of Health, Authored by Sen. Jackie (D-San Mateo), Senate Bill 1630 also prohibited public schools from accepting sponsorships from supplement manufacturers. And it forbade school officials to promote or sell PEDS to students.”
(“Pumping Poison” by Peter Byrne; San Jose Metro; 11/17-23/2004; p. 11.)


32. “The bill was not directed against vitamins, minerals, Gatorade and benign substances that are generally recognized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as safe. Speier targeted the use of pain-numbing concoctions designed to build muscle mass and improve athletic performance by exciting the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. Popular dietary supplements, such as ephedrine and androstenedione, have been linked to the deaths of young athletes.” (Idem.)

33. “In his veto message, Schwarzenegger claimed, without citing any statistics or studies, that most dietary supplements are safe. He said that state regulation of supplements is not needed because the FDA already regulates these substances. ‘What most people do not understand is that PEDS are not regulated by the FDA,’ says Roger Blake, an official with the California Interscholastic Federation, a state-funded organization of high school sports officials advocating for Speier’s bill. The FDA treats cocktails of ‘body shredding’ amino acids and hormones as food. The agency does not test nor approve them. . .” (Idem.)

34. “ . . . According to Schwarzenegger’s Statement of Economic Interests, he had extensive financial ties to the PEDS industry when he assumed office in November 2003. The California Political Reform Act, as administered by the Fair Political Practices Commission, says that an elected official, such as the governor, must disqualify himself from taking any governmental action on a matter which he has reason to know could significantly impact his economic interests. FPPC guidelines say that an official has an economic interest in an individual or organization from whom he has ‘received $500 or more in income within 12 months prior to the [relevant governmental] decision.’” (Idem.)

35. “In order for a conflict of interest to occur, the official’s action must be discretionary. It must significantly impact his economic interest. Depending on the size of the interest, the definition of ‘significant’ ranges from $5,000 to $10 million. . .” (Ibid.; pp. 11-13.)

36. “ . . . Last year, according to the disclosure, Schwarzenegger received income from 18 manufacturers and distributors of PEDS. Products sold by these companies include creatine monohydrate, glutamine, testosterone boosters, anabolics and fruit-flavored amino acid drinks. [Schwarzenegger business partner Jim] Lorimer says that these companies are all paid sponsors of the Arnold Classic.” (Ibid.; p. 13.)

37. “This world-class event is also sponsored by Weider Publications, which owns Muscle & Fitness and FLEX magazines: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, executive editor. Both of the governor’s muscle mags are packed with advertisements for PEDS. An unsigned in a recent FLEX observed, ‘At the pro level, muscle enhancing drugs, such as testosterone, anabolic steroids and growth hormone, are a fact of life.’” (Idem.) Schwarzenegger is also moving to centralize power under the control of his

38. administration. He is, in fact, moving to become the strong leader—the fuhrer—that he has long sought to be. In FTR#429, we examined the late Alastair Cook’s ruminations about the possibility that Schwarzenegger might become the first American Fuhrer. “The proposal to reorganize state government, unveiled last week, contains some elements that are reasonable and some that aren’t. Most disturbing in the plan—buried deep in the 2,500-page report—is an agenda to bolster Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s grip on power. . .”
(“Schwarzenegger’s Power Grab” by Jody Freeman; Los Angeles Times; 8/9/2004; p. 1.)


39. The media have handled Schwarzenegger with kid gloves. At least part of the “free pass” that Schwarzenegger has received comes from the fact that his wife is a Democrat and a member of the Kennedy family. Maria Shriver is also a media star in her own right. An incident in 1978 suggests that theirs is a sick relationship and that Maria harbors a masochistic streak that raises more questions than it answers. “On September 15th, Arnold and Maria were in New Orleans for the Spinks-Ali fight at the Superdome. Arnold had never been to New Orleans, so their guide was bodybuilding great Boyer Coe, a Louisiana native. After a day’s sightseeing Boyer took Arnold and Maria to dinner at the Caribbean Room in the Ponchartrain Hotel.”
(Arnold: The Unauthorized Biography; by Wendy Leigh; Copyright 1990 by Wendy Leigh; Congdon & Weed [HC]; ISBN 0-86553-216-8; pp. 168-169.)


40. “There he ordered the hotel’s special dessert for them to share; Mile High Pie, which measures a foot high, is an enticing mixture of spumoni topped with meringue and smothered in thick chocolate sauce. Smiling in anticipation, Maria was about to eat a mouthful when, suddenly, Arnold grabbed her by the back of the neck and pushed her face right into it. Maria, niece of a president, granddaughter of a multimillionaire, and one of America’s princesses, found herself covered in mounds of meringue and rivulets of chocolate sauce.” (Ibid.; p. 169.)

41. “Boyer says that Maria was, to say the least, surprised. Arnold, of course, having captured the attention of the entire Caribbean Room, was delighted. He reportedly played the pie-in-the-face joke on Maria and other friends a number of times. In a July 1988 interview with Cable Guide, he boasted about a variation on it—telling a waitress that the cream is off, inviting her to smell it, then pushing her face into it. In another interview Maria, when asked by a journalist which of Arnold’s qualities she liked, declared, ‘his sense of humor.’ And when the journalist, who had done his homework, asked, ‘You mean the sour-milk-in-the-face trick doesn’t appall you?’ Maria answered, ‘No.’ Persisting, he asked, ‘Not even in your own face?’ ‘No, of course not,’ came the reply.” (Idem.)

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

FTR #495 Follow the Money, an Update on 9/11

Recorded January 16, 2005
REALAUDIO

When Washington Post reporters Woodward and Bernstein consulted with their anonymous informant “Deep Throat,” he advised them to “follow the money.” This program highlights the significance of the 9/11 money trail in understanding the fundamentals of that monumental incident. Beginning with discussion of Michael Chertoff—nominated to head up the Department of Homeland Security—the show sets forth Chertoff’s legal representation of a New Jersey doctor (Dr. Magdy el-Amir) who appears to have actively funded bin Laden’s activities. When Chertoff was overseeing the day-to-day operations of the 9/11 investigations, he did not investigate his former client, raising serious questions about conflict of interest and his fitness to hold such a sensitive position. The second half of the program updates various aspects of the investigations into terrorist funding—Operation Green Quest, in particular.

Program Highlights Include: Investigations into the relationship of the Riggs Bank to the CIA and Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia; the expansion of an investigation into Yeslam bin Laden’s relationship to Al Qaeda; the sentencing of two associates of the Muslim Brotherhood to prison terms; the relationship of Abdurahman Alamoudi to GOP kingpin Grover Norquist; disclosure that stock trader Anthony Elgindy had been receiving inside information about the FBI’s investigation into 9/11; the fact that Elgindy had donated a considerable amount of money to Mercy International, an Islamic charity that is an offshoot of Al Qaeda financial repository Bank Al Taqwa.

1. The first half of the program is devoted to the subject of Michael Chertoff, the man who oversaw the most critical aspects of the legal investigation of 9/11. Chertoff is the Bush administration nominee to head the Department of Homeland Security. Chertoff represented an apparent Al Qaeda funding source—Dr. Magdy el-Amir. His successful defense of Dr. el-Amir and his apparent continued cover-up of his client’s activities raise serious questions about Chertoff’s qualifications for the job. It appears that Chertoff is another of the Bush administration officials with professional connections to the people involved with Al Qaeda and/or the Muslim Brotherhood. (For more about this, see--among other programs—FTR#’s 356, 357, 415, 454, 462, 464, 467.) “Michael Chertoff, appointed by President Bush to head the Homeland Security Department, may have shielded from criminal prosecution a former client suspected by law enforcement of having funneled millions of dollars directly to Osama bin Laden while in charge of the U.S. Government’s 9/11 investigation. [Italics are Mr. Emory’s.] Egyptian-born Dr. Magdy el-Amir, a prominent New Jersey neurologist, was at the center of terrorist intrigue in Jersey City.”
(“Did Bush’s New Homeland Chief Shield Terror Ring in New Jersey?” by Daniel Hopsicker; MadCowMorningNews; 1/12/2005; p. 1.)

2. Chertoff represented Dr. Magdy el-Amir, who has a number of connections to the milieu of Al Qaeda: “El-Amir gave money to a conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing--Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman. His brother in Cairo was caught on tape attempting to buy weapons from an American undercover agent for Islamic militant groups. Before being arrested in a terrorist deal involving oil and heroin for guns and training, arms smuggler Diaa Mohsen was paid at least $5,000 by one of Dr. el Amir’s companies, NBC’s Dateline reported. And his HMO was suspected by law enforcement of being used to funnel money directly to Osama bin Laden.” (Idem.)

3. “Chertoff’s client ‘caused more than $507 million to be paid by wire transfers to be paid by wire transfers to unknown parties,’ said the lawsuit filed shortly before the state took over his failing HMO. News accounts about el-Amir’s legal difficulties contain unanswered questions about undue political influence and its effect on national security. For example, how did el-Amir who only the month before had been granted a state license to operate an HMO, finagle a lucrative contract from the state of New Jersey in 1995?” (Ibid.; pp. 1-2.)

4. “ ‘Why was this doctor allowed to start a health plan?’ asked the October 25, 1999 issue of the medical trade journal Medical Economics. ‘How could this medical entrepreneur, who had no experience running a managed-care or health insurance company, receive a license for an HMO that now provides care to 44,000 of New Jersey’s most vulnerable citizens?’ asked The Bergen Record. ‘Moreover, how could the state pay such a novice $6 million a month in taxpayers money to take on such a responsibility?’ Why did Michael Chertoff even take the case?” (Ibid.; p. 2.)

5. Like Grover Norquist’s associates in the Islamic Institute (see the program descriptions noted above), Dr. el-Amir appears to have bought his extraordinary status with a generous donation to the Republican Party. His HMO may have been funded by Osama bin Laden, and funds skimmed from the HMO apparently went to support Al Qaeda. “Answers were slow in coming, until it was revealed that at the same time el-Amir was pitching state business he had begun making generous contributions to the governing Republican party, donating nearly $18,000 to various GOP candidates in 1996. And a foreign intelligence report made available to the Chairman of the House International Committee alleged that an HMO owned by Dr. el-Amir in New Jersey was ‘funded by bin Laden,’ and that in turn Dr. el-Amir was skimming money from the HMO to fund ‘terrorist activities.’ . . .” (Idem.)

6. “Stuff like that doesn’t happen, does it? In New Jersey? Barely three years after enrolling its first patient, APPP lay in financial ruins, its network doctors and hospitals were saddled with millions of dollars in unpaid claims, and its founder had retained the services of Michael Chertoff. Did Chertoff know where the stolen money was going?” (Idem.)

7. “ ‘Frankly, we can’t differentiate between terrorism and organized crime and drug dealing,’ then-Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff told the Senate Banking Committee looking into the terrorists’ money trail in the aftermath of 9/11. ‘These groups don’t hold themselves independently: They work with one another. Terrorists get engaged in drug activity. They have relationships with organized crime,’ Chertoff said.” (Idem.)

8. Note that Chertoff was in charge of the day-to-day operations of the 9/11 investigation, even after successfully shielding his former client from investigation. “Chertoff was undoubtedly worth every penny Dr. Magdy paid him: though doctors and hospitals calculated they were owed more than $45 million, Dr. el-Amir faced no criminal charges. When the MadCow Morning News first reported on Mob and terrorist connections to “Magic Dutch Boy’ Rudi Dekkers and the covert operations conducted at the Venice Airport, Michael Chertoff was running the official U.S. investigation. [Italics are Mr. Emory’s.] Dekkers remains free. Magdy el-Amir continues to live and practice in New Jersey.” (Ibid.; pp. 2-3.)

9. “Now that Chertoff has been tapped to keep America safe, questions are sure to resurface about whether he hadn’t himself been instrumental in helping to make America dangerous. Documents in the el-Amir case remain under seal. Fortunately, the following information does not. From the Bergen County Record (New Jersey) on January 24, 1999: ‘For a while, Magdy el-Amir looked like the Horatio Alger of managed care in New Jersey. An Egyptian immigrant who parlayed a storefront medical practice in Jersey City into a multimillion-dollar health-care empire that served thousands of the state’s poorest citizens, he lived in a Saddle River mansion and contributed generously to candidates for political office’ . . .” (Ibid.; p. 3.)

10. “ ‘His health maintenance organization, American Preferred Provider Plan Inc., is about to be sold by state regulators to salvage some money for doctors and hospitals who calculate they’re owed more than $45 million.’ In August 2002, NBC’s 'Dateline' reported on the el-Amir case: ‘Last fall, DATELINE obtained information about this man, Magdy el-Amir, he’s a prominent doctor, a neurologist with a practice in Jersey City. Born and educated in Egypt, he moved to this country about 20 years ago and since then has built a fortune’ . . .” (Idem.)

11. “ ‘Well, take a look at this document obtained by DATELINE last fall. A foreign intelligence report that makes a startling allegation about the doctor, that he has had financial ties with Osama bin Laden for years. The report was given to a senior member of Congress, Ben Gilman, back in 1998 when he was chairman of the House International Relations Committee’ . . . The report alleges that an HMO owned by Dr. el-Amir in New Jersey was ‘funded by bin Laden,’ and that in turn, Dr. el-Amir was skimming money from the HMO to fund ‘terrorist activities.’. . .” (Idem.)

12. “ ‘Less than a year after the congressman says the FBI received the report, Dr. el-Amir’s HMO was taken over by the state of New Jersey. . . according to sources close to the investigation, more than $15 million is unaccounted for. Where did that money go? DATELINE has reviewed documents that show at least some of it went into hard-to-trace offshore bank accounts’ . . . But the intelligence report suggests one thing that he doesn’t deny, that he has donated money to the mosque where the blind sheik once preached, Omar Abdel-Rahman, who is now in prison for his role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing’ . . .” (Idem.)

13. “ ‘DATELINE has found another reason why federal investigators might want to pay close attention to Dr. el-Amir and his family. It’s something we learned when we interviewed Randy Glass, the con man-turned-undercover operative who helped the government break up an illegal weapons ring allegedly tied to terrorist groups. It turns out that one of the people recorded trying to arrange an arms deal with Randy Glass was Dr. el-Amir’s own brother, Mohamed, an engineer, also a US citizen now living in Egypt. And just listen to what he was interested in’ . . .” (Idem.)

14. “ ‘Mr. GLASS: (From tape) OK. They want to ship things like tanks, correct?’ ‘Mr. EL AMIR: (From tape), Un-huh. . . No, no, no, no, just ammunition, not tanks.’ ‘Glass says federal agents told him to drop the matter’ . . . ‘That same intelligence report that talks about Dr. [Magdy] el-Amir also names his brother Mohamed as having ties to Osama bin Laden.’” (Idem.)

15. “The el-Amirs appear to be intimately linked with Osama bin Laden, making the following report from The Bergen Record quite puzzling, dated December 11, 1998: ‘A Superior judge on Thursday ordered state Insurance Commissioner . . . to take control of American Preferred Provider Plan, Inc., a health-maintenance organization for Medicaid patients allegedly bled dry by its Saddle River owner, neurologist Magdy el-Amir. . .’” (Ibid.; p. 4.)

16. “ ‘But in a hint of the gravity of his legal predicament, he was represented in court by Michael Chertoff, the former U.S. attorney in Newark and counsel to U.S. Sen. Alfonse D’Amato’s Whitewater Investigation.’ Yes, the soon-to-be Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff represented a known bin Laden operative. Perhaps more troubling, Chertoff also headed the U.S.’s investigation into the September 11th attack. From the New Jersey Law Journal, August 4, 2003: ‘The Sept. 11th investigation was supervised by Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, head of the U.S. Criminal Justice Division, who is now a Third Circuit judge.” (Idem.)

17. “More on Chertoff from the New Yorker, November 5, 2001: ‘Since the September 11th terrorist attacks, Chertoff’s office has become the funnel for what is probably the most important criminal investigation in American history, as prosecutors and F.B.I. investigators pour in to seek the boss’s approval. What leads can we use from the search of a hijacker’s car in Portland, Maine? Where do the hijackers’ credit-card records lead? . . . For day-to-day decisions, Chertoff has the last word’.” (Idem.)

18. “Though el-Amir’s HMO was known to be affiliated with bin Laden since the mid-1990’s, Chertoff offers an alternate view of the HMO’s financial statements. From The Record, December 18, 1998: ‘El-Amir’s attorney, Michael Chertoff, the former U.S. attorney in Newark, offered the doctor’s first in-depth defense to the state charges Thursday, insisting that el-Amir had not misappropriated any funds from APPP [el-Amir’s HMO].’” (Idem.)

19. “Also from The Record, December 16, 1998: ‘Michael Chertoff, a former U.S. attorney, who is el-Amir’s attorney, said the state’s papers don’t give the complete picture of the company’s finances. ‘It’s a one-sided picture of what’s going on,’ he said. It would be unfortunate if the state’s approach is to find someone to punish, rather than solve the problem.’ Chertoff said el-Amir would like to work with the state in its effort to rehabilitate the HMO.’” (Idem.)

20. “Chertoff’s comments on the case made the New York Times on December 18, 1998: ‘Dr. el-Amir’s lawyer, Michael Chertoff, said that all transactions were approved by state agencies and that his client has done nothing improper.’” (Idem.)

21. “The Bergen Record printed a post-trial wrap-up of the case on February 22, 2000: ‘A year after a Medicaid HMO accused of misusing state and federal funds was dissolved by the state, its founder is still enjoying a millionaire’s income while the hospitals and doctors who allegedly were defrauded delay programs for the poor and fight for restitution’ . . .APP’s founder, Saddle River neurologist Magdy el-Amir, continues to practice medicine in a Jersey City storefront office and lives in a $ 1.8 million mansion in one of Bergen County’s toniest suburbs, court records show. His car leases alone total $65,000 per year, the records show. The Egyptian immigrant also operates a chain of MRI facilities in Newark, Irvington, and Paterson, a limousine company, and a medical management company. Combined with his medical practice, his income totals more than $18,000 weekly, nearly $1 million a year, records show.’” (Ibid.; pp. 4-5.)

22. “ ‘He’s still in good spirits,’ said Michael Chertoff, the former U.S. attorney in Newark whom el-Amir hired as his defense lawyer. Public records in the civil case contain no reference to a criminal investigation but court officials said some documents in the case were under seal. The state Attorney General’s Office would neither confirm nor deny an investigation. The state’s Medicaid fraud division is not involved in the case, a Medicaid spokesman said’ . . .” (Idem.)

23. Be sure to read Daniel’s original article in its entirety.

24. Reprising information presented in FTR#391, the program highlights the significance of Osama bin Laden’s fund-raising capabilities for his rise in the Jihadist hierarchy during, and after, the Mujahideen war against the Soviets in Afghanistan. It was his ability to use his family connections to raise money that was the key to his ascendancy within the Muhahideen. “Years before the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington, Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda organization and other terrorist groups had systematically built financial networks capable of sustaining their aim of bringing their war to the United States on its own soil. Indeed, bin Laden initially rose to prominence not as a fighter but as the most influential financier of the mujahideen fighting to drive the Soviet army out of Afghanistan. ‘It is this financial architecture that continued with him when he turned to terrorism, and it’s this financial architecture that is at the heart of how al Qaeda today gets its finances,’ said William F. Wechsler, who specialized in tracking terrorist funding while at the National Security Council during the last two years of the Clinton administration.”
(Blood From Stones; by Douglas Farah; Broadway Books [HC]; Copyright 2004 by Douglas Farah; ISBN 0-7679-1562-3; p. 1.)

25. “When bin Laden was given sanctuary by the Taliban in Afghanistan in 1996, he was able to use his rolodex to solicit funds while building a stable base of operations. Within a few years the al Qaeda money trail stretched from the tropical diamond fields of West Africa to the gold markets of the United Arab Emirates, from the money merchants of Pakistan to the suburbs of Washington, D.C. the melding of the financial resources with the control of a country made al Qaeda a terrorist organization without peer.” (Idem.)

26. Among the aspects of the 9/11 money trail that have been under investigation is the Riggs Bank. Holding accounts used by the Saudi Embassy, the bank has been suspected of being a source for monies used in the execution of the 9/11 attacks. (The president’s uncle—Jonathan Bush—is a director of the bank.) One powerful obstacle to an open, transparent investigation of Riggs concerns the operations conducted through that bank by Prince Bandar—Saudi Ambassador to the U.S., close friend and ally of the Bush family, and a longtime CIA asset. (For more about Riggs Bank, see: FTR#’s 431, 438, 442, 447, 461.) “ . . . Prince Bandar’s connections to the CIA have long been a significant, albeit little-discussed, aspect of the Riggs affair. During the initial phase of the controversy over Saudi accounts at Riggs in early 2003. Prince Bandar detailed his work for the CIA in a meeting with Treasury Secretary John Snow, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials who interpreted the disclosure as an explanation for the prince’s large unexplained cash transactions at Riggs. [Italics are Mr. Emory’s]”
(“Riggs Bank Had Longstanding Link to the CIA” by Glenn R. Simpson; The Wall Street Journal; 12/31/2004; p. A4.)

27. Notice that some of the covert operations with which Bandar was involved include the Iran-Contra affair and the Afghan mujahideen support effort—both operations with evidentiary tributaries running forward to the events in and around 9/11.) “The meeting took place at the Treasury Department’s headquarters on Pennsylvania Avenue, which is across the street from Riggs headquarters. A spokesman for Prince Bandar declined to comment on the specifics of the discussions with Mr. Snow, as did the Treasury Department. During the 1980’s, Prince Bandar helped fund the anticommunist Nicaraguan Contra rebels at the request of the White House and CIA, and later helped support Afghan rebels fighting the Soviet Union. More recently, he helped broker a diplomatic rapprochement between the U.S. and Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi.” (Idem.)

28. Next, the program revisits the subject of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Operation Green Quest raids of 3/20/2002. One of the principal figures in the SAAR network milieu—Abdurahman Alamoudi—has been sentenced to prison without cooperating with federal prosecutors. Alamoudi is very close to the GOP/Islamist network constructed by Grover Norquist, as well as to the Islamofascist Muslim Brotherhood network that spawned Al Qaeda. Another Brotherhood figure who was (like Alamoudi) connected to Youssef Nada was Soliman Biheiri is also looking at some serious time. (For more about Operation Green Quest, Norquist, Alamoudi, the Muslim Brotherhood et al, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 356, 357, 359, 415, 435, 454, 455, 456, 462, 464, 467.) Two key figures in a government probe of alleged terror financing in the U.S. likely face long prison stints after last week. Muslim leader Abdurahman Alamoudi, once a prominent lobbyist for Islamic causes, received a 23-year sentence for violating terrorism sanctions against Libya. Soliman Biheiri, who managed money for a top Hamas leader as well as Mr. Alamoudi, was convicted of immigration fraud and lying about his ties to the Palestinian terrorist group. . . .”
(“Terror Finance Suspects Face Prison” by Glenn R. Simpson; The Wall Street Journal; 10/18/2004; p. A10.)

29. “ . . . With his guilty plea, Mr. Alamoudi promised to cooperate with the Justice Department, but the decision by prosecutors to proceed with sentencing indicates he has yet to give anything they consider useful. If that changes. Mr. Alamoudi can apply for a reduction in his sentence. . . .” (Idem.)

30. “ . . . The founder of BMI Inc., an Islamic investment firm that went bankrupt four years ago amid allegations of fraud, Mr. Biheiri has acknowledged extensive dealings with numerous top Muslim Brotherhood figures, officials say. His convictions carry a sentence of as long as 15 years, and prosecutors want to add a so-called terrorism enhancement that could boost it by an additional 10 years. The government wants the two men to cooperate in a continuing probe of a network of Islamic organizations centered in a continuing probe of a network of Islamic organizations centered in Herndon, Va., and founded by top U.S. leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood. The group, which received its original funding from wealthy Islamists in the Middle East and has millions of dollars in assets, is under investigation for tax fraud and racketeering as well as possible ties to terrorism.” (Idem.)

31. Following the update on Alamoudi, Biheiri and the Muslim Brotherhood, the program highlights the continuing probe into the operations of Osama’s half-brother Yeslam bin Laden and Yeslam’s SICO firm. Disclaimers to the contrary notwithstanding, there are a number of indications that SICO has been involved in Al Qaeda’s activities. (For more about SICO, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 354, 355, 356, 357, 377, 482, 492.) “A French judge has widened a probe into the financial network surrounding the family of Osama bin Laden after questioning his half-brother and learning of a 241 million euro transfer to Pakistan, Le Monde daily said. Investigating magistrate Renaud Van Ruymbeke received court authorization to extend his investigation after Yeslam bin Laden was questioned on Sept. 27 over allegations of links with the organizers of attacks in 2001 in the United States, the paper said in its Saturday edition.”
(“French Magistrate Widens Bin Laden Finance Probe” [Reuters]; 12/25/2004; p. 1.)

32. “As a result, Van Ruymbeke was adding ‘other instances of money laundering’ to the probe already under way, Le Monde said. The court was unreachable for comment on Saturday. On Dec. 5, 2001, French authorities opened an investigation into financial transfers carried out through Paris between firms grouped within the Saudi Investment Company (SICO) run by Yeslam bin Laden, who also manages some assets of the family’s Saudi Binladin Group (SBG). Yeslam bin Laden was questioned by the French judge in 2002, and has handed over a copy of documents detailing the distribution of the bin Laden family wealth to 54 brothers and sisters after the death of their father in 1967, the paper said.” (Idem.)

33. It appears that, his disclaimer to the contrary notwithstanding, Yeslam has had contact with Osama in the past 20 years. “Although he denied having had any contact with his half-brother for the past 20 years, the paper said, documents held by Swiss banking authorities suggest that Yeslam and Osama bin Laden held a joint account in Switzerland between 1990 and 1997, according to Jean-Charles Brisard—a private investigator hired by families of the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks. Yeslam told French investigators in September that he had omitted to mention the existence of that account, while still insisting he had not had mixed with his half-brother, Le Monde said. Yeslam bin Laden’s Swiss-based lawyer, Pierre de Preux, could not immediately be reached by Reuters for comment. . . .” (Idem.)

34. “ . . . The French authorities, however, say the facts require further checking. Brisard notified Van Ruymbeke on Sept. 6 this year of several suspicious funds transfers, Le Monde said. The investigator noted a 241 million euro transfer made to Pakistan in 2000 from an account belonging to a company called Cambridge, a SBG subsidiary that was opened at Deutsche Bank in Geneva, the paper added. U.S. authorities are aware of the existence of those funds, which they believe were transferred into an account belonging jointly to Osama bin Laden and someone of Pakistani nationality, it said. The French authorities say the presence of SICO within the Saudi Binladin Group’s orbit in Geneva justifies its probe, Le Monde added.” (Idem.)

35. A fascinating and important detail concerning the hijackers is the fact that Yeslam bin Laden’s SICO subsidiary trained its pilots at Huffman Aviation in Venice, Florida!! Huffman is the school at which Atta and company were “trained.” Although he denies it, there are profound indications that Yeslam and SICO are involved with the activities of Al Qaeda. (For more on this, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 354, 355, 356, 377.) This subject will be dealt with at greater length below. “ . . . Swiss police questioned Yeslam [bin Laden] because one of his companies, Avcon Air Charter, had offered flight training to clients at the Venice flight school attended by some of the hijackers. As a result of what Le Monde called ‘a still unexplained coincidence,’ the pilots of Yeslam bin Laden’s company trained at Huffman Aviation in Florida, the paper stated. ‘I didn’t chose that flight school,’ Yeslam protested. ‘I don’t have contact with my half-brother since over 20 years ago.’”
(Welcome to Terrorland: Mohamed Atta & the 9-11 Cover-Up in Florida; by Daniel Hopsicker; Madcow Press [HC]; Copyright 2004 by Daniel Hopsicker; ISBN 0-9706591-6-4; p. 178.)

36. “Swiss magazine L’Hebdo reported that Swiss federal inspectors were seeking information on the activities of several bin Laden family companies, including Geneva-based Saudi Investment Company, a financial clearinghouse for the family’s international investments, and Avcon Business Jets SA, which owned a fleet of private jets which it leased to clients. . . .” (Idem.)

37. Reviewing information presented in FTR#356, the program notes that SICO opened 16 unpublished accounts with the Clearstream network in early 2001. (For more about the Clearstream network—owned by the Deutsche Borse [the German stock exchange]—see FTR#’s 356, 357, 360, 367, 376, 387, 458, 463, 485.) The possibility that these accounts were used to finance the activities of 9/11, including (perhaps) the enormous amounts of cash available to Rudi Dekkers, Atta and company is one to be SERIOUSLY INVESTIGATED. Note in this context that Clearstream is owned by the Deutsche Borse, which in turn is owned by the major German commercial banks and they are controlled by the Bormann group. Note also that the BCCI heavily utilized the Clearstream network, as (apparently) did the 9/11 conspirators. As noted in FTR#’s 462, 464, Robert Mueller covered up the BCCI investigation and his FBI is now covering up Operation Green Quest—the investigation into the 9/11 money trail. “In November, U.S. authorities named some banks that had bin Laden accounts, and it put them on a blacklist. One was Al Taqwa, ‘Fear of God,’ registered in the Bahamas with offices in Lugano, Switzerland. Al Taqwa had access to the Clearstream system through its correspondent account with the Banca del Gottardo in Lugano, which has a published Clearstream account (No. 74381). But Bin Laden may have other access to the unpublished system. In what he calls a ‘spectacular discovery,’ Ernest Backes reports that in the weeks before CEO Andre Lussi was forced to leave Clearstream last May, a series of 16 unpublished accounts were opened under the name of the Saudi Investment Company, or SICO, the Geneva holding of the Saudi Binladen Group, which is run by Osama’s brother Yeslam Binladen (some family members spell the name differently.) Yeslam Binladen insists hat he has nothing to do with his brother, but evidence suggests SICO is tied into Osama’s financial network. SICO is associated with Dar Al-Maal-Al-Islami (DMI), an Islamic financial institution also based in Geneva and presided over by Prince Muhammed Al Faisal Al Saoud, a cousin of Saudi King Fahd, that directs millions a year to fundamentalist movements. DMI holds a share of the Al Shamal Islamic Bank of Sudan, which was set up in 1991 and partly financed by $50 million from Osama bin Laden. Furthermore, one of SICO’s administrators, Geneva attorney Baudoin Dunand, is a partner in a law firm, Magnin Dunand & Partners, that set up the Swiss financial services company SBA, a subsidiary of the SBA Bank in Paris, which is controlled by the bin Mahfouz Family.”
(“Banking with Bin Laden” by Lucy Komisar [sidebar to “Explosive Revelation$”]; In These Times; 3/15/2002.)
(For more about SICO, Yeslam Bin Laden, and Baudoin Dunand, see FTR#’s 354, 355, 456.)


38. A former co-chairman of the board of directors of SICO (the holding company that manages the Bin Laden business interests in Europe) is Baudoin Dunand, a friend and professional associate of Francois Genoud, one of the most important postwar operatives of the Underground Reich. Dunand is a director of SICO at present. Dunand’s involvement with the Bin Mahfouz interests is discussed above. (For more about Genoud, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 453, 456.) “This company, established by the bin Ladens in 1980, is the flagship for the group’s activities in Europe. It is headed by Yeslam bin Laden, and the board of directors is made up almost exclusively of members of the family clan, except for a Swiss citizen, Baudoin Dunand. This well-known lawyer from French-speaking Switzerland, who is on the boards of several dozen companies, came to public notice in 1983 when he agreed to represent the Swiss banker Francois Genoud, a controversial figure who had been a disciple of Hitler and sole heir of Goebbels’s copyrights before becoming one of the financiers of the FLN during the Algerian War. The friendships of the bin Ladens sometimes seem surprising, but they are logical: Francois Genoud has always been pro-Arab.”
(In the Name of Osama Bin Laden; by Roland Jacquard; Copyright 2002 [SC]; Duke University Press; ISBN 0-8223-2991-3; pp. 17-18.)

39. The program concludes with discussion of Anthony Elgindy, suspected by some of having foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks. Elgindy was receiving inside information from a former FBI agent, who was keeping him apprised of developments in the FBI’s investigation of 9/11. (For more about Elgindy, see FTR#361.) “A former FBI agent admitted that he gave online stock traders confidential details of federal investigations, including a probe of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. One of the recipients was San Diego penny-stock picker Anthony Elgindy. Elgindy was investigated by a Justice Department task force examining whether anyone might have known of the terrorists’ plans and profited by selling vulnerable stocks just before the attacks, Jeffrey Royer said. . . .”
(“Ex-FBI Agent Admits He Gave Tips” [AP]; Los Angeles Times; 1/5/2005)

40. “For five days, jurors have seen dozens of e-mail messages, a litany of Internet chat room logs and countless company reports as federal prosecutors presented their conspiracy case against Anthony Elgindy, the San Diego stock adviser accused of obtaining illegal information from an F.B.I. agent to manipulate the stock market. But they will not hear evidence supporting an assertion that prosecutors once made suggesting that Mr. Elgindy might have had advance knowledge of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, a judge said yesterday.”
(“Judge in Stock Adviser’s Trial Bars Testimony on Terrorism” by Eric Dash; New York Times; 11/9/2004.)

41. “The matter came up in the fourth full day of testimony in United States District Court in Brooklyn. Derrick Cleveland, a former business associate of Mr. Elgindy who is now a government witness, was asked by an assistant United States attorney, Kenneth Breen, about a mid-September 2001 F.B.I. investigation into Mr. Elgindy. When Mr. Cleveland responded that the investigation was related to ‘terrorism,’ Judge Raymond J. Dearie brought the hearing to a halt. . . .” (Idem.)

42. It is noteworthy that Elgindy had contributed to Mercy International, an offshoot of the Bank Al Taqwa—the financial arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. (For more about Bank Al Taqwa, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 354, 356, 359, 377, 378, 387, 455, 456, 462, 464.) “ . . . Mr. Cleveland was allowed to continue with his testimony, recounting how he learned that Mr. Elgindy was a subject in a criminal investigation. Mr. Cleveland said that Jeffrey A. Royer, an F.B.I. agent who was the source of that information and a defendant in the case, told him that investigators were looking into $6 million that Mr. Elgindy had liquidated from two brokerage companies, Charles Schwab and Salomon Smith Barney, shortly before Sept. 11. Mr. Royer also relayed information that the government was examining the money Mr. Elgindy gave to Mercy International, which Mr. Breen described as a Middle Eastern charity.” (Idem.)

43. Illustrating the connections between Mercy International, Al Taqwa, Gulf Office and the Embassy bombings in 1998, the program reviews information presented in—among other programs—FTR#’s 349, 351, 361, 377. “The Milanese connection originates in the Bahamas. Since leaving its first head office in Nassau, Al Taqwa established itself at NIGH (Nasreddin International Group Holdings)—10, Dewaux Street in Nassau. The NIGH holding company deserves close attention. Yussef Nada’s assistant Ali Ghaleb Himmat works there. The Bank of Gothard is NIGH’s bank, through account CC/B No. 313656, through the agency of Chiasso, in the name of a Charity foundation. The Bank of Gothard also appears, in a confidential report on Al Taqwa’s activity, under the heading of business connections. The bank manager at Gothard, Claudio Generale, told me, however, that he does not know either Al Taqwa or its director, much less the holding company NIGH.”
(Dollars for Terror: The United States and Islam; by Richard Labeviere; Copyright 2000 [SC]; Algora Publishing; ISBN 1-892941-06-6; p. 150.)

44. “The president and creator of NIGH, Nasreddin Ahmed Idris, who also appears on the list of the first shareholders in Al Taqwa, is honorary consul of Kuwait in Milan. Living in Italy, Switzerland and Morocco, this businessman directs a multitude of financial companies, most of which end up leading again to the nebula of Al Taqwa. One of them, Gulf Office (Association for Commercial, Industrial and Tourist Development between the Gulf States and Switzerland), currently dormant, had been housed in the same building as the mosque of Lugano. In 1994, the Italian judicial system had its sights on Gulf Office and conducted an inquiry into its activities in the context of the operation ‘clean hands’. . . .” (Idem.)

45. “But Nasreddin Ahmed Idris’s real representative at the head of Gulf Office is another member of the Muslim Brothers, Khaldoun Dia Eddine, who belongs to the Syrian branch of the organization. He too was ‘employed’ by the bank Al Taqwa, which he represented in Lugano, before he took on the coordination of the activities of ‘Mercy International,’ an Islamic humanitarian organization. The humanitarian organizations, Islamic nongovernmental organizations (NGO’s), represent one of the other ‘derivative products’ from Al Taqwa bank.” (Ibid.; p. 151.)

46. On the Thanksgiving holiday in the United States, an Israeli-owned resort was bombed in Mombasa, Kenya. Mercy International’s situation is interesting to contemplate in the context of that bombing. “Lastly, in the spring of 1997, the Kenyan police also dismantled several Islamic NGO’s in Mombasa and the Sudan border area, including an office of ‘Mercy International.’” (Ibid.; p. 353.)

47. It is worth noting where Mercy International relocated to: “Today, [1999] Mercy International has moved its headquarters to the United States: it declares a gross budget of $2 million.” (Ibid.; pp. 151-152.) Have Mercy!